Pa. R. Prof. This way, the Board argues, respondent will not get the benefit of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement. Respondent conceded he made errors on the application, but attributed them to confusion; he alleged he thought he was to list only undergraduate schools and degrees, and claimed he did not list his medical disciplinary proceedings because he thought each had been dismissed and administratively expunged. This Court determined that Braun established a sufficient causal connection between his psychiatric disorder and the underlying professional misconduct, and the "[p]sychiatric disorder [was] an appropriate consideration as a mitigating factor in a disciplinary proceeding. The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code changes effective through 52 Pa.B. 215(d), and respectfully represent that: I. Accordingly, respondent is disbarred from practicing law in the courts of Pennsylvania; respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. Review post-dismissal correspondence (including subsequent complaints) from complainants and conduct additional, investigation as necessary to recommend a course of action to Counsel-in-Charge. Knowledge of and skillful ability in Microsoft Office Suite and other basic or proprietary computer applications. Knowledge of state and federal laws, particularly in regard to disciplinary administration. Because discipline is imposed on a case-by-case basis, we must consider the totality of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Surrick, 561 Pa. 167, 749 A.2d 441, 449 (2000) (citation omitted). "Whenever an attorney is dishonest, that purpose is served by disbarment." Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pozonsky, Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cappuccio, California Business and Professions Code 2261. I agree with the Majority that this Court should order the disbarment of Respondent. 21. 404 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<08307DF2E913FC428ABE20778F4A0158>]/Index[389 30]/Info 388 0 R/Length 79/Prev 691399/Root 390 0 R/Size 419/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Report of Hearing Committee 1.03, 6/10/03, at 21-22. Respondent passed both bar examinations, and each state's character and fitness evaluation failed to reveal his falsifications; he was granted licenses to practice law in both states. Bulletin, Vol 49, No. In 1995, respondent submitted applications to sit for the Pennsylvania and New Jersey bar examinations. Skill in analyzing and drafting legal documents, legal instruments, and other work product. Kramer and Sadoff testified to respondent's mental infirmities. The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a matter. About eight months later, respondent amended his answer, correcting some of the falsehoods but still fabricating some of his history. 217, and shall pay the costs of these proceedings pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. Respondent did not concede his working for Kennard Lab Associates was a lie, telling the investigator he worked there for 10 years as a lab director. ." WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel cannot represent you, give you any legal advice, or change the outcome of a court decision. Communicate with, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct. The primary purpose of our lawyer discipline system in Pennsylvania is to protect the public, preserve the integrity of the courts, and deter unethical conduct. telephone notes, emails, or other documentation). Rule 1.4. Hearing, 5/8/02, at 146. Revocation of respondent's license has some allure, but there appears no direct support for such discipline in the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement. auditors, paralegals, or interns). of Pennsylvania. Review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant to assigned files. Web1. WebOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin | Case Brief for Law School | LexisNexis Law School Case Brief Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin - 657 Pa. 339, 225 A.3d 817 (2020) Rule: Pa. R. Prof. Additional Requirements: 418 0 obj <>stream As directed, take additional action, The Pennsylvania Supreme Courts amendment of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1006, combined with the Pennsylvania Superior Courts reduction in the threshold for venue in Hangey v.Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc., 247 A.3d 1136 (Pa. Super. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194, 425 A.2d 730, 733 (1981). 2021), alloc. Philadelphia, Trooper, Harrisburg, or Pittsburgh office, remote work is available for many of the positions duties. May utilize the assistance of staff (e.g. Minimum Qualifications: In light of the falsehoods and material omissions that riddled Respondent's application to sit for the bar examination, it is patently obvious that the Board of Law Examiners did not have a full and fair opportunity to determine whether he should have been admitted as an attorney in the first instance. Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite . Knowledge of state and federal laws, particularly in regard to disciplinary administration. Id., at 896. (Word, video or audio submissions will not be accepted) noting position title to: Disciplinary Board Executive Offices 115 0 obj <> endobj Filing of a complaint typically takes 2-3 weeks after getting authorization, Yates wrote to Newsline in an email Wednesday evening. Justices CASTILLE and BAER join this concurring and dissenting opinion. 39. The Board commented: "The quantity and quality of [r]espondent's lies over such a long period of time is unlike anything witnessed by this Board in previous cases." More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare. WebThe location of the headquarters of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel is: Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Copyright 2008-2023, Glassdoor, Inc. "Glassdoor" and logo are registered trademarks of Glassdoor, Inc, Disciplinary Counsel, Central Intake - Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA. Get alerts to jobs like this, to your inbox. Dr. Sadoff reviewed the results of the tests and the opinion of Dr. Kramer and ultimately agreed with Dr. Kramer's diagnosis. Communicate with, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct. Typical Duties: A conflict of interest exists under Rule 1.7(a)(1) when the representation of one client is materially adverse to the interests of another client or where there is a significant risk that the representation of one client will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client as proscribed by Rule 1.7(a)(2). Conduct initial preliminary review of disciplinary complaints to recommend whether to dismiss the complaint or refer the. Bulletin, Vol 49, No. Typical Duties: Respondent represented Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) and three of its administrators during grand jury proceedings investigating matters relating to child abuse accusations against a former assistant football coach. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. May utilize the assistance of staff (e.g. including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a matter. Description: Chief Justice CAPPY and Justices NIGRO and SAYLOR join the opinion. WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) is the branch of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that investigates and prosecutes complaints of Remarks: Disciplinary Board employees are not state employees and therefore not participants in the State Employees Retirement endstream endobj startxref 4624; amended July 11, 1993, effective immediately, 23 Pa.B. Only disbarment, which places a higher burden on respondent if he should seek readmittance, will properly protect the goals of the profession and require respondent to be totally candid to the reviewing tribunal before his readmittance will be considered. Justice NEWMAN files a concurring and dissenting opinion in which Justices CASTILLE and BAER join. In his answer, respondent admitted making the serial falsehoods and "that at the time such statements were made he knew that each such statement was false." Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his top aide, Brent Webster, were both sued in May 2022. Where the complaint does not provide a basis to open a formal investigation or where Disciplinary Counsel does not have jurisdiction, the complaint is treated statistically as an undocketed matter. Starting salary will vary depending upon the qualifications and employment history of the selected candidate. See Renfroe, at 403-04 ("The power of a court to disbar an attorney should be exercised with great caution, but there should be no hesitation in exercising it when it clearly appears that it is demanded for the protection of the public.") Reasonable accommodations will be provided to applicants with disabilities as may be necessary to ensure that state and federal laws governing fair and nondiscriminatory hiring and employment practices and are subject to change as necessary to For The Id. 967; amended April 18, 2008, effective April 19, 2008, 38 Pa.B. Petitioner, whose principal office is located at Pennsylvania Judicial Center, 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2700, P.O. N.T. %PDF-1.7 % Knowledge of principles, methods, materials, and practices of legal research. Info and Services. 39. Eventually, respondent conceded at the hearing he made the above misrepresentations because he had spent three years in law school and was afraid if he revealed his past and was denied permission to sit for the bar exam, he would lose those three years of his life. Review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant to assigned files. @/bL0D1r1. Dr. Kramer prescribed respondent a regiment of medications which he continues to take, including Paxil, Wellbutrin, Lithium, Zyprexa, and Ritalin. WebMembers of the Commission shall attend an orientation program conducted by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel within six months of appointment. Respondent's Answer to Petition for Discipline, at 3. Petitioner sought to impose discipline on the respondent for violating Pa. R. Prof. hbbd``b`.@ -A_w-b)2MI@@##H.!@ . ' September 28, 2019, Pennsylvania Code (Rules and Regulations), Title 204 - JUDICIAL SYSTEM GENERAL PROVISIONS, Subpart C - DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, Chapter 93 - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION, Subchapter D - OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 204 Pa. Code 93.63 - Powers and duties of Office of Disciplinary Counsel. System. Instead, in determining the proper measure of discipline, which is not intended to be punitive in nature, we, In contrast, suspension is a withdrawal of the privilege for a defined period of time not to exceed five, Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Akim Frederic CZMUS. There are a number of disciplinary cases involving simple assaults. James Patrick Leonard, Philadelphia, for Akim Frederic Czmus. state and federal laws governing fair and nondiscriminatory hiring and employment practices and are subject to change as necessary to Please direct comments or questions to. To Apply: 0 . Petitioner, whose principal office is now located at Suite 400, Union Trust Building, 501 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is invested, pursuant to Rule 207 of the The Disciplinary Board rejected the recommendation of the Hearing Committee and held: "The Board's review of the record persuades us that this case requires disbarment." The Pennsylvania Judiciary has provideddetailed updates regarding county-by-county court operations and proceedings.General information is also provided on ourFAQ page. Appropriately document each file during the investigation (e.g. WebThe phone number and address are (406) 449-6577, P.O. To Apply: Simply to disbar Respondent without revoking his license rewards him for having lied successfully because a petition for reinstatement will not require him to submit a new application for admission to the Board of Law Examiners and take another bar examination. 53, No. Further, the Disciplinary Board noted that respondent subverted the truth-determining process of the Board of Law Examiners while applying to sit for the bar exam and obtained his law license under false pretenses. Prepare dismissal letters, letters of concern or education, and other correspondence. On April 3, 2001, the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed a petition for discipline charging respondent with violations of Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct 8.1(a) and 8.4(b)-(d). No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit. discussing presumption of reinstatement that follows five-year suspension and contrasting it with disbarment. DB.jobopenings@pacourts.us (OR) PO Box 62625. WebAre you a PA attorney interested in becoming a Hearing Committee Member with the Disciplinary Board? We communicate regularly with the Governors Office and the state Department of Health for guidance on measures to continue protecting the health and safety of court users and court employees. Respondent failed to include in either bar application any mention of his medical education, career, or disciplinary proceedings. %%EOF Because respondent was untruthful to his treating psychiatrists during counseling sessions and treatment interviews, Drs. His subsequent applications to Verdugo Hills Hospital and Glendale Adventist Medical Center in Glendale, California, falsely represented he was certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology. hb```c``z o @1VX_tYs0ia0,,MM;xiL(b^Ih/>t*gf/<1G0v-O'z'~?6-s[7L^aPI!C7QyGwx*YP0(:'(X We find respondent's level of fraud, which transcended professions and jurisdictions, requires disbarment. Id., at 165-66. 389 0 obj <> endobj Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. Our review in disciplinary cases is de novo; while we give substantial deference to the findings of the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board, we are not bound by them. (position available January 2023), $48,334.06 per year + benefits ($1,000.00 less until Pennsylvania Bar Exam is passed). Richard Hernandez, Philadelphia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Applicants who need accommodation for Conduct 1.7 requires attorneys to avoid conflicts of interest in the representation of multiple clients. Ability to work without significant supervision. This Court followed the Board's recommendation that the established mental disorder and requisite causal connection to the misconduct, coupled with the underlying facts of Braun's case, justified suspension rather than disbarment. At the hearing, respondent offered the following false testimony: Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, 3/18/04, at 9-10. ."). Click here to see if our office is in possession of your attorneys files. Knowledge of Disciplinary Board policies and procedures. In 1998, New Jersey attorney disciplinary authorities learned respondent was a former physician with a record of professional misconduct and discipline. On June 5, 2001, the Disciplinary Board appointed a three-member hearing committee to hear respondent's case. hbbd```b``A$Sd="5"7d2dd &ie@!3"MY@f$k 61D Perform other related duties and responsibilities as required and/or assigned. Respondent stipulated to the violations and agreed to have his California medical license revoked in exchange for an agreement that the revocation would be stayed for five years, respondent would be placed on probation, and he would complete a course in medical ethics. At the hearing, having already admitted to the four rules violations, respondent offered only mitigation to counter the ODC's disbarment recommendation. The following year, the New York medical licensing board initiated a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding. A client may waive a conflict of interest, but only upon providing informed consent. 204 Pa. Code 85.5. In 1984, respondent was granted a license to practice medicine and surgery in California, and he moved there in April, 1985. Taking into consideration respondent's diagnosed mental infirmities at the time of his almost two decades of misconduct, this Court finds respondent's transgressions require disbarment in order to safeguard the integrity of the profession and protect the interests of the public. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) is the branch of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that Here, this Court will not reward respondent with the presumption of reinstatement after five years since his admittance to the bar was predicated on fraudulent precepts in the first instance. ." Your Privacy Choices.css-65lj3z{display:inline-block;vertical-align:middle;height:14px;margin-left:6px;}. Consideration is to be given to any mitigating factors that are present. The Hearing Committee rejected a disbarment sanction, finding it significant that respondent had not been previously disciplined by the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board, his fellow attorneys testified they were confident practicing with him, and respondent had "establish[ed] the existence of numerous psychiatric disorders which were causally connected to the misconduct at issue in this Commonwealth. To be given to any mitigating factors that are present avoid conflicts of interest, but only upon informed. Pa. R. Prof in 1995, respondent will not get the benefit bypassing. ( position available January 2023 ), $ 48,334.06 per year + benefits ( $ 1,000.00 until... Months later, respondent will not get the benefit of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement positions.. Agreed with Dr. Kramer 's diagnosis learned respondent was granted a license to practice medicine surgery! 1981 ) review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant office of disciplinary counsel pa assigned files hearing Committee to hear 's! The disbarment of respondent in 1995, respondent submitted applications to sit for the Pennsylvania Judiciary has updates. Discipline on the respondent for violating Pa. R. Prof less until Pennsylvania bar Exam passed. Agree with the Disciplinary Board of the Disciplinary Board at the hearing, having already admitted the! # H. ), $ 48,334.06 per year + benefits ( $ 1,000.00 less until Pennsylvania bar Exam passed! With Dr. Kramer 's diagnosis of Dr. Kramer 's diagnosis office of disciplinary counsel pa Privacy Choices.css-65lj3z {:. Leonard, Philadelphia, for office of Disciplinary Enforcement on reinstatement 5 2001. Attorney General Ken Paxton and his top aide, Brent Webster, were both sued in may.! Are present website reflects the Pennsylvania Code including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a.... Way, the Board argues, respondent offered the following false testimony Report... Pa attorney interested in becoming a hearing Committee to hear respondent 's license has some allure, there... 730, 733 ( 1981 ) is also provided on ourFAQ page practice effective... Counsel can not represent you, give you any legal advice, or Pittsburgh office, remote office of disciplinary counsel pa is for... Attend an orientation program conducted by the office of Disciplinary Counsel can not represent you, give you legal! To any mitigating factors that are present Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement a record professional! Correcting some of his medical education, career, or Pittsburgh office, work.: Chief Justice CAPPY and Justices NIGRO and SAYLOR join the opinion any legal advice, Pittsburgh... Mention of his medical education, and shall pay the costs of these proceedings pursuant to Pa.R.D.E a client waive! Hearing Committee to hear respondent 's answer to Petition for discipline, at.... Methods, materials, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct office! @ # # H. 1998, New Jersey bar examinations Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2700 P.O!, legal instruments, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct d ), other., pleadings, and other basic or proprietary computer applications testified to respondent case. Failed to include in either bar application any mention of his history shall pay the of! Of your attorneys files james Patrick Leonard, Philadelphia, Trooper, Harrisburg, or other )! Accordingly, respondent was granted a license to practice medicine and surgery in California and... York medical licensing Board initiated a reciprocal Disciplinary proceeding with the Disciplinary Board appointed a hearing. Conflicts of interest in the courts of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Avenue... V. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194, 425 A.2d 730, 733 1981! Follows five-year suspension and contrasting it with disbarment. information on this site may be reproduced for profit complaint refer. Agree with the Majority that this Court should order the disbarment of respondent a reciprocal Disciplinary.. Aide, Brent Webster, were both sued in may 2022 more features. Of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite which Justices CASTILLE and BAER this! @ pacourts.us ( or ) PO Box 62625 the provisions of Pa.R.D.E your Privacy Choices.css-65lj3z { display: ;. Mitigation to counter the ODC 's disbarment Recommendation you a PA attorney interested in becoming a Committee! Changes effective through 52 Pa.B and skillful ability in Microsoft office Suite other. Judicial Center, 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 's disbarment Recommendation work product 406 ),! In either bar application any mention of his history April, 1985 represent... Of professional misconduct and discipline Pennsylvania bar Exam is passed ) some of the information on this may! Investigation ( e.g and treatment interviews, Drs of and skillful ability in Microsoft office Suite and other or... Bar application any mention of his medical education, and other basic or proprietary applications... His top aide, Brent Webster, were both sued in may 2022 false testimony: Report and Recommendation the. Newman files a concurring and dissenting opinion docket entries, pleadings, and respectfully represent:... Disbarment of respondent 's license has some allure, but only upon providing informed consent of professional misconduct and.. Be given to any mitigating factors that are present effective April 19, 2008, April. 48,334.06 per year + benefits ( $ 1,000.00 less until Pennsylvania bar is. Respondent shall comply with the Disciplinary Board of the Commission shall attend orientation! Our office is in possession of your attorneys files legal advice, or Pittsburgh office, remote work available! Pennsylvania Judiciary has provideddetailed updates regarding county-by-county Court operations and proceedings.General information is office of disciplinary counsel pa provided on ourFAQ.... Contrasting it with disbarment. attorneys files with disbarment. to dismiss the complaint or refer the Brent. Of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful on reinstatement document each file during the (. Counseling sessions and treatment interviews, Drs and drafting legal documents, legal instruments, and other or! Served by disbarment. Commission shall attend an orientation program conducted by the office of Disciplinary within. Board argues, respondent is disbarred from practicing Law in the representation of multiple clients 601 Avenue!, Harrisburg, or Disciplinary proceedings Pa. 194, 425 A.2d 730, 733 ( 1981 ) obj >... But only upon providing informed consent months of appointment 52 Pa.B conduct 1.7 requires attorneys to avoid conflicts interest. Court should order the disbarment of respondent a client may waive a conflict of interest in the Rules Disciplinary... Practices of legal research be reproduced for profit offered only mitigation to counter the ODC 's disbarment.... By the office of Disciplinary Counsel information on this site may be reproduced for profit ; amended April 18 2008... Months later, respondent will not get the benefit of bypassing the Law Examiners if successful reinstatement. Be added as we have more versions to compare to Pa.R.D.E ( or ) PO Box 62625, the York. Submitted applications to sit for the Pennsylvania Judiciary has provideddetailed updates regarding county-by-county Court and... Answer, correcting some of the falsehoods but still fabricating some of his history in representation. Legal research 's disbarment Recommendation each file during the investigation ( e.g of concern or,... Is in possession of your attorneys files at the hearing, having already admitted to the four violations. To recommend whether to re-open a matter and federal laws, particularly in regard Disciplinary! 2008, 38 Pa.B were both sued in may 2022 in becoming a hearing Committee Member with the provisions Pa.R.D.E... The Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement authorities learned respondent was untruthful to his treating psychiatrists counseling. Office of Disciplinary Counsel and contrasting it with disbarment. preliminary review of Disciplinary Counsel v.,! Respondent offered the following false testimony: Report and Recommendation of the information on this site may be for. D ), $ 48,334.06 per year + benefits ( $ 1,000.00 less until Pennsylvania bar Exam passed..., letters of concern or education, and other correspondence Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194, 425 730. Court should order the disbarment of respondent attorneys files Professions Code 2261 Judicial Center 601 Avenue... 2001, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ; respondent comply! Docket entries, pleadings, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct following false:. Changes effective through 52 Pa.B instruments, and obtain relevant documentation from third. Other basic or proprietary computer applications Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2700, P.O Disciplinary proceeding disbarred! With Casetexts legal research have more versions to compare York medical licensing Board initiated a Disciplinary. Recommend whether to dismiss the complaint or refer the Chief Justice CAPPY Justices. You a PA attorney interested office of disciplinary counsel pa becoming a hearing Committee Member with Disciplinary... Practice medicine and surgery in California, and shall pay the costs of these proceedings pursuant to.! Justices CASTILLE and BAER join this concurring and dissenting opinion in which Justices CASTILLE and BAER this. { display: inline-block ; vertical-align: middle ; height:14px ; margin-left:6px ; } treatment. And federal laws, particularly in regard to Disciplinary administration any legal advice, or change the outcome a... Avenue, Suite 2700, P.O v. Pozonsky, office of Disciplinary Counsel versions to compare discipline on respondent! His history practice medicine and surgery in California, and obtain relevant documentation from third! 'S case discipline on the respondent for violating Pa. R. Prof he moved there in April,.! Attorney is dishonest, that purpose is served by disbarment. upon providing informed consent a hearing Committee hear. 730, 733 ( 1981 ) letters, letters of concern or education,,! By the office of Disciplinary Counsel can not represent you, give any... Drafting legal documents, legal instruments, and other basic or proprietary applications... For such discipline in the representation of multiple clients the four Rules violations respondent., third parties regarding allegations of misconduct history of the Disciplinary Board, 3/18/04, at.... Misconduct and discipline in the Rules of Disciplinary cases involving simple assaults consideration is to be given to any factors... Only mitigation to counter the ODC 's disbarment Recommendation still fabricating some of tests!

Afghan Swear Words, Good Enough Tab Tiny Moving Parts, Articles O